Romans 9:6a – Not all Israel is Israel
Paul begins his defense of divine election unto salvation thusly: “But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel” (Rom 9:6).
Paul responds quickly by saying, “Yes, it is true God chose Israel. Yes, it is true that God made a covenant with Israel. Yes, it is true that many in Israel are accursed and cut off from God. But no, it is not true that God’s Word has failed.” All that follows in the next several verses are used for the express purpose of proving this assertion of Paul’s. We must keep that in mind as we make our way through the passage.
In other words, Paul instructs his objectors that they have misunderstood God’s intentions as revealed in Scripture. Paul’s vocabulary reveals this in verses 6 and 11. Look at the following interaction:
9:6 – “God’s word has not failed (fallen)”
is the opposite of
9:11 – “in order that God’s purpose of election might continue (stand)”
Note carefully why Paul is able to declare that God’s word has not failed and why God’s purpose will succeed: “Not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel” (9:6). A literal translation of this verse reads, “all who are of Israel, these are not Israel.”
If God’s word is “all ethnic or natural-born Jews are to be saved,” then clearly God’s word and purpose has failed. However, Paul denies that God ever intended to save all of Abraham’s physical descendents. Instead, God’s purpose will be shown to be a plan to save a remnant of Israel, not the entirety of the race.
Paul’s point here is that the rampant unbelief among ethnic Israel does not invalidate God’s promises. Paul is going to argue that these specific promises were not made to ethnic Israel; they were made to spiritually elect Israel. To put it as simply as possible: not every person who is a physically ethnic Israelite is a spiritually elect Israelite. There is an Israel within Israel. There is a true Israel.
Also, it must be noted again that the only way to understand this verse is to think of individuals, not nations. Paul is most assuredly not saying, “They are not all nations of Israel who are descended from the one nation of Israel.” That does not even make sense. Instead, Paul is addressing individual Jews who can trace their family lineage back to Abraham, the father of the Jews through his sons Isaac and Jacob.
Romans 9:6b-8 – True Israel
In order to prove his point, Paul next appeals to the national history of Israel – the families of Abraham and Isaac.
6 . . . For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, 7 and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but “Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.” 8 This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.
In verse 7, Paul writes that “not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring.” He explains what he means by this when he brings Isaac into the equation. Abraham had two sons: Isaac and Ishmael. These two then had sons of their own. However, Paul tells us here that it is only “through Isaac shall [Abraham’s] offspring be named” (9:7b). To be related to Abraham physically does not guarantee that you will be a child of God. The Pharisees believed this to be the case, as seen in their interaction with Jesus in John 8:37-40:
37 “I know that you are offspring of Abraham; yet you seek to kill me because my word finds no place in you. 38 I speak of what I have seen with my Father, and you do what you have heard from your father.” 39 They answered him, “Araham is our father.” Jesus said to them, “If you were Abraham’s children, you would be doing the works Abraham did, 40 but now you seek to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God. This is not what Abraham did.”
Finally, Paul tries to explain his point as clearly as possible in verse 8: “This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.” God could have done it differently but He is free to do as He wants. The promises and privileges Paul mentioned in the first five verses are for the “children of the promise” but not “children of the flesh.” The “children of the flesh” are physical descendents whom God has not chosen and “children of the promise” are physical descendents whom God has chosen to be beneficiaries of the covenant.
By Jeff Spry (www.monergism.com)
***This is part of a blog series on the Sovereignty of God. This topic has been highly mis-understood throughout much of evangelicalism. Some will say they believe that God is sovereign, yet deny its many implications. Others will completely deny God’s Sovereignty because of it’s implications. We hope that you will stick with this extensive study on the Sovereignty of God. We will be including resources from a variety of Theologians and Authors, that will hopefully be able to answer many of the misnomers and questions that you may have***